Influence of psychiatric co-morbidity on health-related quality of life among major trauma patients.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare 1-year post-discharge health-related quality of life (HRQL) between trauma patients with and without psychiatric co-comorbidity. METHODS: A retrospective single-center cohort study identified all severely injured adult trauma patients admitted to a Level 1 trauma center between 2018 and 2019. Bivariate analysis compared patients with and without psychiatric co-morbidity, which was defined as prior diagnosis by a healthcare provider or acute psychiatric consultation for new or chronic mental illness. HRQL metrics included the EuroQol-5D-5L (EQ-5D) questionnaire, visual analogue scale (EQ-VAS), and overall index score. A multiple linear regression model was utilized to identify predictors of EQ-5D index scores. RESULTS: Analysis of baseline characteristics revealed significantly greater rates of substance abuse, severe extremity injuries, inpatient morbidity, and hospital length-of-stay among patients with psychiatric illness. At 1-year follow-up, patients with psychiatric co-morbidity had lower median EQ-5D index scores compared to the control group (0.71, interquartile range [IQR] 0.32 vs. 0.79, IQR 0.22, p = 0.03). There were no differences between groups in individual EQ-5D dimensions, nor in EQ-VAS scores. Presence of psychiatric co-morbidity was not found to independently predict EQ-5D index scores in the linear regression model. Instead, Injury Severity Score (standardized regression coefficient [SRC] - 0.15, 95% confidence interval [CI] - 0.010 to - 0.001) and American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status score (SRC - 0.13, 95% CI - 0.08 to - 0.004) predicted poor HRQL 1-year after injury. CONCLUSIONS: Psychiatric co-morbidity does not independently predict low HRQL 1 year after injury. Instead, lower HRQL scores among patients with psychiatric co-morbidity appear to be mediated by baseline health status and injury severity.

The effect of an on-site trauma surgeon during resuscitations of severely injured patients.

BACKGROUND: Although the timely involvement of trauma surgeons is widely accepted as standard care in a trauma center, there is an ongoing debate regarding the value of an on-site attending trauma surgeon compared to an on-call trauma surgeon. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of introducing an on-site trauma surgeons and the effect of their presence on the adherence to Advanced Trauma Life Support (ATLS) related tasks and resuscitation pace in the trauma bay. METHODS: The resuscitations of severely injured (ISS > 15) trauma patients 1 month before and 1 month after the introduction of an on-site trauma surgeon were assessed using video analysis. The primary outcome was total resuscitation time. Second, time from trauma bay admission until tasks were performed, and ATLS adherence were assessed. RESULTS: Fifty-eight videos of resuscitations have been analyzed. After the introduction of an on-site trauma surgeon, the mean total resuscitation time was 259 seconds shorter (p = 0.03) and seven ATLS related tasks (breathing assessment, first and second IV access, EKG monitoring and abdominal, pelvic, and long bone examination; were performed significantly earlier during trauma resuscitation (p ≤ 0.05). Further, we found a significant enhancement to the adherence of six ATLS related tasks (Airway assessment, application of a rigid collar, IV access; EKG monitoring, log roll, and pronouncing results of arterial blood gas analysis; p-value ≤0.05). CONCLUSION: Having a trauma surgeon on-site during trauma resuscitations of severely injured patients resulted in improved processes in the trauma bay. This demonstrates the need of direct involvement of trauma surgeons in institutions treating severely injured patients.

Epidemiology and outcome of rib fractures: a nationwide study in the Netherlands.

PURPOSE: Rib fractures following thoracic trauma are frequently encountered injuries and associated with a significant morbidity and mortality. The aim of this study was to provide current data on the epidemiology, in-hospital outcomes and 30-day mortality of rib fractures, and to evaluate these results for different subgroups. METHODS: A nationwide retrospective cohort study was performed with the use of the Dutch Trauma Registry which covers 99% of the acutely admitted Dutch trauma population. All patients aged 18 years and older admitted to the hospital between January 2015 and December 2017 with one or more rib fractures were included. Incidence rates were calculated using demographic data from the Dutch Population Register. Subgroup analyses were performed for flail chest, polytrauma, primary thoracic trauma, and elderly patients. RESULTS: A total of 14,850 patients were admitted between 2015 and 2017 with one or more rib fractures, which was 6.0% of all trauma patients. Of these, 573 (3.9%) patients had a flail chest, 4438 (29.9%) were polytrauma patients, 9273 (63.4%) were patients with primary thoracic trauma, and 6663 (44.9%) were elderly patients. The incidence rate of patients with rib fractures for the entire cohort was 29 per 100.000 person-years. The overall 30-day mortality was 6.9% (n = 1208) with higher rates observed in flail chest (11.9%), polytrauma (14.8%), and elderly patients (11.7%). The median hospital length of stay was 6 days (IQR, 3-11) and 37.3% were admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU). CONCLUSIONS: Rib fractures are a relevant and frequently occurring problem among the trauma population. Subgroup analyses showed that there is a substantial heterogeneity among patients with rib fractures with considerable differences regarding the epidemiology, in-hospital outcomes, and 30-day mortality.

Traumatic rib fractures: a marker of severe injury. A nationwide study using the National Trauma Data Bank.

BACKGROUND: In recent years, there has been increasing interest in the treatment of patients with rib fractures. However, the current literature on the epidemiology and outcomes of rib fractures is outdated and inconsistent. Furthermore, although it has been suggested that there is a large heterogeneity among patients with traumatic rib fractures, there is insufficient literature reporting on the outcomes of different subgroups. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study using the National Trauma Data Bank was performed. All adult patients with one or more traumatic rib fractures or flail chest who were admitted to a hospital between January 2010 and December 2016 were identified by the International Classification of Diseases Ninth Revision diagnostic codes. RESULTS: Of the 564 798 included patients with one or more rib fractures, 44.9% (n=2 53 564) were patients with polytrauma. Two per cent had open rib fractures (n=11 433, 2.0%) and flail chest was found in 4% (n=23 388, 4.1%) of all cases. Motor vehicle accidents (n=237 995, 51.6%) were the most common cause of rib fractures in patients with polytrauma and flail chest. Blunt chest injury accounted for 95.5% (n=5 39 422) of rib fractures. Rib fractures in elderly patients were predominantly caused by high and low energy falls (n=67 675, 51.9%). Ultimately, 49.5% (n=2 79 615) of all patients were admitted to an intensive care unit, of whom a quarter (n=146 191, 25.9%) required invasive mechanical ventilatory support. The overall mortality rate was 5.6% (n=31 524). DISCUSSION: Traumatic rib fractures are a marker of severe injury as approximately half of patients were patients with polytrauma. Furthermore, patients with rib fractures are a very heterogeneous group with a considerable difference in epidemiology, injury characteristics and in-hospital outcomes. Worse outcomes were predominantly observed among patients with polytrauma and flail chest. Future studies should recognize these differences and treatment should be evaluated accordingly. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II/III.

Complications and outcome after rib fracture fixation: A systematic review.

BACKGROUND: In recent years, there has been a growing interest in operative treatment for multiple rib fractures and flail chest. However, to date, there is no comprehensive study that extensively focused on the incidence of complications associated with rib fracture fixation. Furthermore, there is insufficient knowledge about the short- and long-term outcomes after rib fracture fixation. METHODS: This systematic review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines. The MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases were searched to identify studies reporting on complications and/or outcome of surgical treatment after rib fractures. Complications were subdivided into (1) surgery- and implant-related complications, (2) bone-healing complications, (3) pulmonary complications, and (4) mortality. RESULTS: Forty-eight studies were included, with information about 1,952 patients who received rib fracture fixation because of flail chest or multiple rib fractures. The overall risk of surgery- and implant-related complications was 10.3%, with wound infection in 2.2% and fracture-related infection in 1.3% of patients. Symptomatic nonunion was a relatively uncommon complication after rib fixation (1.3%). Pulmonary complications were found in 30.9% of patients, and the overall mortality was 2.9%, of which one third appeared to be the result of the thoracic injuries and none directly related to the surgical procedure. The most frequently used questionnaire to assess patient quality of life was the EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D) (n = 4). Four studies reporting on the EQ-5D had a weighted mean EQ-5D index of 0.80 indicating good quality of life after rib fracture fixation. CONCLUSION: Surgical fixation can be considered as a safe procedure with a considerably low complication risk and satisfactory long-term outcomes, with surgery- and implant-related complications in approximately 10% of the patients. However, the clinically most relevant complications such as infections occur infrequently, and the number of complications requiring immediate (surgical) treatment is low. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Systematic Review, level III.

Injuries related to bicycle accidents: an epidemiological study in The Netherlands.

BACKGROUND: This study aims to analyze the incidence and outcomes of bicycle-related injuries in hospitalized patients in The Netherlands. METHODS: Bicycle accidents resulting in hospitalization in a level-I trauma center in The Netherlands between 2007 and 2017 were retrospectively identified. We subcategorized data of patients involved in a regular bicycle, race bike, off-road bike or e-bike accident. The primary outcomes were mortality rate and incidence of multitrauma. Secondary outcomes were differences between bicycle subcategories. Independent risk factors were identified using multivariable logistic regression. All variables with a p value < 0.20 in univariable analysis were entered in multivariable analysis. RESULTS: We identified 1986 patients. The mortality rate after emergency room admission was 5.7%, and 41.0% were multitraumas. A higher age, multitrauma and cerebral haemorrhages were independent risk factors for in hospital mortality. Independent risk factors found for multitrauma were a higher age, two-sided trauma, e-bike accidents and cerebral haemorrhage. CONCLUSION: Bicycle accidents resulting in hospitalization have a high mortality rate. Furthermore, a high incidence of multitrauma, fractures and cerebral haemorrhages were found. Considering the increasing incidence of bicycle accident victims needing hospital admission, new and more efficient prevention strategies are essential.

The evolution of trauma care in the Netherlands over 20 years.

INTRODUCTION: In 1999 an inclusive trauma system was initiated in the Netherlands and a nationwide trauma registry, including all admitted trauma patients to every hospital, was started. The Dutch trauma system is run by trauma surgeons who treat both the truncal (visceral) and extremity injuries (fractures). MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this comprehensive review based on previous published studies, data over the past 20 years from the central region of the Netherlands (Utrecht) was evaluated. RESULTS: It is demonstrated that the initiation of the trauma systems and the governance by the trauma surgeons led to a region-wide mortality reduction of 50% and a mortality reduction for the most severely injured of 75% in the level 1 trauma centre. Furthermore, major improvements were found in terms of efficiency, demonstrating the quality of the current system and its constructs such as the type of surgeon. Due to the major reduction in mortality over the past few years, the emphasis of trauma care evaluation shifts towards functional outcome of severely injured patients. For the upcoming years, centralisation of severely injured patients should also aim at the balance between skills in primary resuscitation and surgical stabilization versus longitudinal surgical involvement. CONCLUSION: Further centralisation to a limited number of level 1 trauma centres in the Netherlands is necessary to consolidate experience and knowledge for the trauma surgeon. The future trauma surgeon, as specialist for injured patients, should be able to provide the vast majority of trauma care in this system. For the remaining part, intramural, regional and national collaboration is essential.

[Penetrating neck injury caused by stabbing: a rare but complex problem in the Netherlands]. / Penetrerend halsletsel door steekverwondingen.

Penetrating neck injuries (PNIs) as a result of stabbing or deliberate self-harm are complex and potentially life-threatening. Nowadays, selective non-operative management of PNI has become common practice. Diagnostic and treatment algorithms originating from high-volume trauma centres in South-Africa and North-America are used in Dutch clinical practice. Three patients that sustained a PNI are discussed. Two patients, aged 61 and 37, only had mild signs on physical examination that justified additional diagnostic investigations. In the first patient, a penetrating oesophageal injury was found and repaired. The latter had a partial Horner syndrome as a result of PNI, no underlying injuries were found. One patient, aged 57, was haemodynamically unstable and therefore received immediate surgical exploration of the neck. A penetrating injury of the jugular vein was discovered and repaired. A summary of literature and guidelines is presented for the benefit of Dutch physicians that may be confronted with these complex injuries.

Development and validation of a novel prediction model to identify patients in need of specialized trauma care during field triage: design and rationale of the GOAT study.

BACKGROUND: Adequate field triage of trauma patients is crucial to transport patients to the right hospital. Mistriage and subsequent interhospital transfers should be minimized to reduce avoidable mortality, life-long disabilities, and costs. Availability of a prehospital triage tool may help to identify patients in need of specialized trauma care and to determine the optimal transportation destination. METHODS: The GOAT (Gradient Boosted Trauma Triage) study is a prospective, multi-site, cross-sectional diagnostic study. Patients transported by at least five ground Emergency Medical Services to any receiving hospital within the Netherlands are eligible for inclusion. The reference standards for the need of specialized trauma care are an Injury Severity Score ≥ 16 and early critical resource use, which will both be assessed by trauma registrars after the final diagnosis is made. Variable selection will be based on ease of use in practice and clinical expertise. A gradient boosting decision tree algorithm will be used to develop the prediction model. Model accuracy will be assessed in terms of discrimination (c-statistic) and calibration (intercept, slope, and plot) on individual participant's data from each participating cluster (i.e., Emergency Medical Service) through internal-external cross-validation. A reference model will be externally validated on each cluster as well. The resulting model statistics will be investigated, compared, and summarized through an individual participant's data meta-analysis. DISCUSSION: The GOAT study protocol describes the development of a new prediction model for identifying patients in need of specialized trauma care. The aim is to attain acceptable undertriage rates and to minimize mortality rates and life-long disabilities.

Epidural Analgesia for Severe Chest Trauma: An Analysis of Current Practice on the Efficacy and Safety.

BACKGROUND: Adequate pain control is essential in the treatment of patients with traumatic rib fractures. Although epidural analgesia is recommended in international guidelines, the use remains debatable and is not undisputed. The aim of this study was to describe the efficacy and safety of epidural analgesia in patients with multiple traumatic rib fractures. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was performed. Patients with ≥3 rib fractures following blunt chest trauma who received epidural analgesia between January 2015 and January 2018 were included. The main outcome parameters were the success rate of epidural analgesia and the incidence of medication-related side effects and catheter-related complications. RESULTS: A total of 76 patients were included. Epidural analgesia was successful in a total of 45 patients (59%), including 22 patients without and in 23 patients with an additional analgesic intervention. In 14 patients (18%), epidural analgesia was terminated early without intervention due to insufficient sensory blockade (n=4), medication-related side effects (n=4), and catheter-related complications (n=6). In 17 patients (22%), the epidural catheter was removed after one or multiple additional interventions due to insufficient pain control. Minor epidural-related complications or side effects were encountered in 36 patients (47%). One patient had a major complication (opioid intoxication). CONCLUSION: Epidural analgesia was successful in 59% of patients; however, 30% needed additional analgesic interventions. As about half of the patients had epidural-related complications, it remains debatable whether epidural analgesia is a sufficient treatment modality in patients with multiple rib fractures.

Feasibility of using head and neck CT imaging to assess skeletal muscle mass in head and neck cancer patients.

OBJECTIVES: Patients with head and neck cancer (HNC) have a higher risk of malnutrition and sarcopenia, which is associated with adverse clinical outcome. As abdominal CT-imaging is often used to detect sarcopenia, such scans are rarely available in HNC patients, possibly explaining why no studies investigate the effect of sarcopenia in this population. We correlated skeletal muscle mass assessed on head and neck CT-scans with abdominal CT-imaging. METHODS: Head and neck, and abdominal CT-scans of trauma (n=51) and HNC-patients (n=52) were retrospectively analyzed. On the head and neck CT-scans, the paravertebral and sternocleidomastoid muscles were delineated. On the abdominal CT-scans, all muscles were delineated. Cross-sectional area (CSA) of the muscles at the level of the C3 vertebra was compared to CSA at the L3 level using linear regression. A multivariate linear regression model was established. RESULTS: HNC-patients had significantly lower muscle CSA than trauma patients (37.9 vs. 45.1cm2, p<0.001, corrected for sex and age). C3 muscle CSA strongly predicted L3 muscle CSA (r=0.785, p<0.001). This correlation was stronger in a multivariate model including sex, age and weight (r=0.891, p<0.001). DISCUSSION: Assessment of skeletal muscle mass on head and neck CT-scans is feasible and may be an alternative to abdominal CT-imaging. This method allows assessment of sarcopenia using routinely performed scans without additional imaging or additional patient burden. Identifying sarcopenic patients may help in treatment selection, or to select HNC patients for physiotherapeutic or nutritional interventions to improve their outcome.

Introducing the Surgical Therapeutic Index in trauma surgery: an assessment tool for the benefits and risks of operative fracture treatment strategies.

BACKGROUND: The Surgical Therapeutic Index (STI) has been described as an indicator of the benefits and risks of surgical treatment. The index is calculated by dividing the cure rate of an operative treatment by the complication rate. This study introduces the STI in trauma surgery by comparing the indices for surgical plate fixation (PF) and intramedullary fixation (IMF) of displaced midshaft clavicular fractures. METHODS: In a previously reported, randomized controlled fashion, 120 patients were assigned to PF or IMF. Cure was defined by a Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score of 8 or less. Complications were noted as present or not present for each follow-up assessment, and a panel of experts provided weights to the severity of complications. STIs were reported along with their 95% confidence intervals. The higher a procedure's STI, the higher the benefit/risk balance of that procedure. RESULTS: The nonweighted STI after 6 weeks was significantly higher in the PF group. During further follow- up, the differences leveled out and became nonsignificant. When weighting the STI for severity, the indices decrease but are significantly in favor of the PF group at 6 weeks and 6 months after surgery. At 1 year postoperatively, differences are not significant. CONCLUSION: The STI may be a reliable tool to assess the benefits and risks of operative fracture treatment. Further studies with consistent results of this new scoring system are needed before conclusions can be generalized. When determining the indices of PF and IMF, a significant difference in favor of PF was observed during the early phase of recovery.

Observation Versus Embolization in Patients with Blunt Splenic Injury After Trauma: A Propensity Score Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Non-operative management (NOM) is the standard of care in hemodynamically stable patients with blunt splenic injury after trauma. Splenic artery embolization (SAE) is reported to increase observation success rate. Studies demonstrating improved splenic salvage rates with SAE primarily compared SAE with historical controls. The aim of this study was to investigate whether SAE improves success rate compared to observation alone in contemporaneous patients with blunt splenic injury. METHODS: We included adult patients with blunt splenic injury admitted to five Level 1 Trauma Centers between January 2009 and December 2012 and selected for NOM. Successful treatment was defined as splenic salvage and no splenic re-intervention. We calculated propensity scores, expressing the probability of undergoing SAE, using multivariable logistic regression and created five strata based on the quintiles of the propensity score distribution. A weighted relative risk (RR) was calculated across strata to express the chances of success with SAE. RESULTS: Two hundred and six patients were included in the study. Treatment was successful in 180 patients: 134/146 (92 %) patients treated with observation and 48/57 (84 %) patients treated with SAE. The weighted RR for success with SAE was 1.17 (0.94-1.45); for complications, the weighted RR was 0.71 (0.41-1.22). The mean number of transfused blood products was 4.4 (SD 9.9) in the observation group versus 9.1 (SD 17.2) in the SAE group. CONCLUSIONS: After correction for confounders with propensity score stratification technique, there was no significant difference between embolization and observation alone with regard to successful treatment in patients with blunt splenic injury after trauma.

[More complications after a fall from height in patients with a mental disorder]. / Meer complicaties na val bij psychiatrische patiënten. Toeval of toch een attitudeprobleem?

In this issue of the Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Geneeskunde researchers from the Amsterdam Medical Centre describe the coincidence of psychiatric comorbidities and complications in patients suffering from a fall from height. Apart from typical somatic issues related to these diseases, such as substance abuse and specific medication, the attitude of healthcare workers toward this category of patients is discussed and critically appraised.

[A new protocol, is the spine still safe?]. / Een nieuw protocol, is de wervelkolom nog veilig?

The latest version of the Dutch National Protocol Ambulance Care (Landelijk Protocol Ambulancezorg LPA8), introduced on 1 January 2015, contains too few guarantees of the safety of trauma patients in whom spinal immobilisation has to be performed. A number of strict indications have been removed and too much freedom is also permitted with respect to implementation. Although the previous standard method using a spinal board, collar and blocks did have disadvantages, the new operating method has been insufficiently substantiated and, in addition, is not well matched to the protocols of Accident and Emergency departments. It is vital that the agencies involved collaborate to reach a joint solution.

Intubation after noninvasive ventilation failure in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: associated factors at emergency department presentation.

OBJECTIVE: Noninvasive ventilation (NIV) is a common practice in acute hypercapnic respiratory failure (AHRF) because of exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). However, a recent study has shown that patients who require invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) after failure of NIV experience high mortality rates (up to 30%). Therefore, the aim of this study is to determine the parameters, specifically for emergency department (ED) presentation, associated with the transition from NIV to IMV because of NIV failure. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This is a 4-year retrospective cohort study in the EDs of two Dutch hospitals. International Classification of Disease codes were used to identify 139 COPD patients treated with NIV. Those with AHRF (pH limits: 7.25-7.35), a full resuscitation order, and those without a pneumonia were selected for the study (n=40 with 50 NIV episodes). Parameters in patients treated successfully with NIV were compared with those in patients requiring transition to IMV due to NIV failure. Univariable regression analysis was used and, if P-value less than 0.20, analyses were entered into a multivariable logistic regression analysis model. RESULTS: NIV was successful in 33 (66%) patients, 10 (20%) required transition to IMV, and seven (14%) died. Age over 65 years and a Glasgow Coma Score less than 15 were associated significantly with the transition from NIV to IMV in multivariable analysis (P<0.05). CONCLUSION: Older age and a low Glasgow Coma Score at ED presentation are factors associated with the transition from NIV to IMV in COPD patients with AHRF.

Variation in treatment of blunt splenic injury in Dutch academic trauma centers.

BACKGROUND: The incidence of splenectomy after trauma is institutionally dependent and varies from 18% to as much as 40%. This is important because variation in management influences splenic salvage. The aim of this study was to investigate whether differences exist between Dutch level 1 trauma centers with respect to the treatment of these injuries, and if variation in treatment was related to splenic salvage, spleen-related reinterventions, and mortality. METHODS: Consecutive adult patients who were admitted between January 2009 and December 2012 to five academic level 1 trauma centers were identified. Multinomial logistic regression was used to measure the influence of hospital on treatment strategy, controlling for hemodynamic instability on admission, high grade (American Association for the Surgery of Trauma 3-5) splenic injury, and injury severity score. Binary logistic regression was used to quantify differences among hospitals in splenic salvage rate. RESULTS: A total of 253 patients were included: 149 (59%) were observed, 57 (23%) were treated with splenic artery embolization and 47 (19%) were operated. The observation rate was comparable in all hospitals. Splenic artery embolization and surgery rates varied from 9%-32% and 8%-28%, respectively. After adjustment, the odds of operative management were significantly higher in one hospital compared with the reference hospital (adjusted odds ratio 4.98 [1.02-24.44]). The odds of splenic salvage were significantly lower in another hospital compared with the reference hospital (adjusted odds ratio 0.20 [0.03-1.32]). CONCLUSIONS: Although observation rates were comparable among the academic trauma centers, embolization and surgery rates varied. A nearly 5-fold increase in the odds of operative management was observed in one hospital, and another hospital had significantly lower odds of splenic salvage. The development of a national guideline is recommended to minimalize splenectomy after trauma.

Segmental tibial fractures: an infrequent but demanding injury.

BACKGROUND: Segmental tibial fractures are considered to be a special injury type associated with high complication rates. However, it is unclear whether healing of these fractures truly differs from that of nonsegmental fractures. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We therefore asked (1) does the time to union in segmental tibial fractures differ from that of nonsegmental fractures; and (2) does the complication rate of segmental fractures differ from that of nonsegmental fractures? METHODS: We retrospectively studied 30 patients with segmental tibial fractures treated at a Level I trauma center from January 2000 to December 2008 and compared healing and complications with a matched control group of 30 nonsegmental tibial fractures. In followup we determined time to union, delayed and nonunion, and overall complication rates. Patients were followed at least until union was attained. The minimum followup was 5 months (median, 15 months; range, 5-54 months). RESULTS: Median time to union was 34 weeks (range, 12-122 weeks). Segmental fractures took longer to heal than nonsegmental fractures (median, 34 weeks; range, 12-122 weeks and median, 24 weeks; range, 11-39 weeks, respectively). The overall rate of complications was higher in segmental fractures as was the necessity for reoperation to attain healing. CONCLUSIONS: Healing of segmental tibial fractures is characterized by substantially more complications and longer healing times than nonsegmental fractures and should be considered as a special type of injury. We believe these should be treated in specialized trauma centers.

Video registration of trauma team performance in the emergency department: the results of a 2-year analysis in a Level 1 trauma center.

BACKGROUND: Trauma teams responsible for the first response to patients with multiple injuries upon arrival in a hospital consist of medical specialists or resident physicians. We hypothesized that 24-hour video registration in the trauma room would allow for precise evaluation of team functioning and deviations from Advanced Trauma Life Support (ATLS) protocols. METHODS: We analyzed all video registrations of trauma patients who visited the emergency room of a Level I trauma center in the Netherlands between September 1, 2000, and September 1, 2002. Analysis was performed with a score list based on ATLS protocols. RESULTS: From a total of 1,256 trauma room presentations, we found a total of 387 video registrations suitable for analysis. The majority of patients had an injury severity score lower than 17 (264 patients), whereas 123 patients were classified as multiple injuries (injury severity score >or=17). Errors in team organization (omission of prehospital report, no evident leadership, unorganized resuscitation, not working according to protocol, and no continued supervision of the patient) lead to significantly more deviations in the treatment than when team organization was uncomplicated. CONCLUSIONS: Video registration of diagnostic and therapeutic procedures by a multidisciplinary trauma team facilitates an accurate analysis of possible deviations from protocol. In addition to identifying technical errors, the role of the team leader can clearly be analyzed and related to team actions. Registration strongly depends on availability of video tapes, timely started registration, and hardware functioning. The results from this study were used to develop a training program for trauma teams in our hospital that specifically focuses on the team leader's functioning.